Should it be this way?
Many people are born into their place in the social status hierarchy. They are born into families with money, or they begin life in countries that can educate them, or at least feed them. Although some people are able to work hard and move out of their income bracket and climb that ladder, most people seem to stay within the financial bracket they were born into. Probably because they are unable to better themselves; the lack the financial backing to do so.
I was reading an article in the JoongAng Daily newspaper here in Korea, and there was one story that particularly stood out, relating to this very topic. The title of the article was "Gaining entry to elite high schools means cramming at a tender age". By cramming they are not talking about studying really hard five minutes before the test. They are talking about attending special "cram schools", like the kind that I teach at. These are schools that the kids would attend after a day of regular school in hopes that they would be prepared when the time came to apply to an elite high school, or even college. These kids spend their childhood setting up their future, and then spend their future teaching their child how to be successful like them.
The problem that I see with this is not that the kids are sleeping four hours a night studying for their exams. That's how the culture has been for the past few decades, ever since they took so strongly to Western philosophy. It's hard work imitating another's culture while leaving your own to rot in the history books. This is not the problem I see (at least, not the problem for this post!). Because these admission tests are so challenging, almost no one with the standard public school education will be able to even apply. The only ones with a shot at getting into these schools are the kids who's parents can afford the private tutor or cram schools. The Korea Teachers and Workers Union state two other problems. They state that "schools are making students overly dependent on private cram schools, while hurting the quality of education at regular schools and causing a gap between the wealthier students who can afford steep cram-school fees and those who cannot".
I suppose the point of this blog is to discuss how this "gap" between the rich and poor continues to widen. I know that these two groups have existed for a long time, but I always thought the perks of being rich seemed to end with their level of education and quality of life. As time moves forward, how much further will the distance become between the two groups?
Colin Beavan's blog No Impact Man is always inspiring to me. Recently, while catching up on his entries, I came across something that connects with this discussion. He highlighted the battle between public water systems and bottled water corporations. The main issue is this: with the growing demand for bottled water over tap water, what will the future hold? There is a pledge that is being passed around that states that one is to drink tap water instead of bottled water. Apparently of the seventy four Americans that drink bottled water, one in five drink ONLY bottled water... For more facts go here.
Currently, there is over one billion people who do not have enough clean water to fulfill their daily needs. By 2025 it is predicted that 2/3 of the worlds population will be in this category. What will happen if only the wealthy(and I say "the wealthy" knowing that I'm in this category) can afford clean water?
This is a longer post than I intended to make it, but I wanted to raise the point that I know has already been raised time and time again. I think that it's important to be conscious of the outcome of our actions. This includes buying bottled water over drinking tap water, driving a car over taking public transportation, leaving the lights or air conditioner on while no one is home, etc. With so much talk on climate change and how we are to shape the future I'm realizing more and more that how we live our individual lives does have an effect on what life will be like down the road. Individuals doing their own thing may only satisfy their personal goals, but a community of individuals holding each other accountable for their actions, this can have a much bigger impact. To sign the tap water pledge click here. For Colin Bevan's blog on this pledge, click here.
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
money - the wedge that divides us all
Posted by chris at 10:14 AM
Labels: climate change, educate, future, individual, no impact man, pledge, school, water
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
hey Chris!
Such a great post. I have been thinking a lot about the education gap too as I spend a lot of time with high schools both public and private. It is a similar situation in the U.S. because it is the wealthy parents that can afford to send their kids to private schools which better equips them to go to an ivy league college. Ultimately this means that wealthy people get a good education, a good-paying job, and leadership positions in politics, corporations, etc. How is that shaping the culture? of course there are exceptions but it's a problem that needs to be addressed. Too bad we don't have any answers yet...
this was an interesting post, but i have a technical point on why the korean education system is the way it is today. the japanese set up the public education system that is seen today during their occupation of korea, so it's not western philosophy that's driving this seeming meritocracy, it's the eastern educational tradition that dates back to china.
on the states side, while the parents of privileged kids do opt to send them to boarding school, these boarding schools can no longer guarantee that their students will gain entry into the ivy leagues. in fact, many private schools do not post the test score statistics on their students, leading me to believe that they're not THAT good. however, students that do attend these (monetarily at least) elite private schools do gain by having the opportunity to network with the kids of other wealthy/influential people.
if you're smart enough, it's actually advantageous (in the college admissions process at least) to come from a poorer, or less well-represented area.
on the flip side, if your parents are famous enough, it doesn't really matter where you go to high school.
and attending a public university doesn't automatically disadvantage you. they've turned out many influential people - to name only a few: (alas) donald rumsfeld, condoleeza rice, colin powell, bill moyers, etc...
anyway, i didn't mean for that to sound so confrontational -- sorry! the point about the increasing disparity between the classes is alarming... it's just so status conscious over there and here in the U.S. as well.
-- thank you so much for your help, chris! --
it's so great that there are other environmentally conscious people out there.
Post a Comment